• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If thats an important condition for you to have before you move on from a lost cause, you should come up with an answer to that question on your own and suggest it.

    • mortalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I just took a look at your post history. It’s literally only anti-Biden. I hope you’re getting paid…

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah I want a Democrat to win the election and Biden has a less than 1 in 20 shot of doing that.

        The only path to stopping Trump is replacing Biden. Continuing to promote Biden as a candidate is you basically asking for project 2025 to become a reality. And as you can see, there are a lot of idiots to push back on who think a guy polling in the low thirties can make it happen.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’re the one saying Biden should be replaced. Why on earth would it be mortalic’s responsibility to suggest the alternative?

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you know what sea lioning is?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

        Its a fundamental form of trolling that OP is engaging in, and that apparently, you think I should engage with.

        Think about it as a metaphor. I come to you with the information that your house is on fire. OP is basically making a rhetorical argument that if I can’t provide them with a house they’ll find suitable, we shouldnt leave the burning house we’re currently in.

        The information about the state of the house (candidate in our case) is independent from there being another house that isn’t on fire.

        You should never, ever engage with people like them. They are not having this discussion in good faith. If its important to them they should suggest a candidate. There are plenty to suggest. But that is a fundamentally separate discussion.