• vzq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even if they are backtracking with egg on their face, this is good. Maybe better. Now they know they can’t get away with this stuff.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man, I really hate seeing comments like this. I feel like I need to reiterate that BitWarden is NOT an open-source company. They are committed to providing open-source compatible products with their products. Two very different things.

      If they feel their product is somehow lacking or affected by whatever they are packaging right now, they are completely free to change it. They also have no barriers to entry for users who wish to use another client.

      It’s really not a big deal.

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s why I said “even if”.

        “Even if” it’s not really a bug and they are backtracking, then [rest of comment here].

        • morriscox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Even if they are backtracking with egg on their face

          Your comment can be read in more than one way.