• p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Of course not, because they didn’t do anything wrong. Just a bunch of pissed off pokemon fanboys pissed that Palworld was way better at the pokemon concept than Pokemon itself was.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah that’s kind of the point.

        (Also wtf are you smoking? “Travel the world collecting animals to be on your team” is the core concept)

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Except Palworld isn’t what you described. It’s “build a base and capture mons and people to out to work at your base so you can climb the tech tree and build guns to fight the boss mons”.

          • 4am@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, ok? The fresh mechanics Pokemon has needed for a long time now. Also, still rounding up ‘mons to build a team to accomplish goal.

            It was similar enough that Nintendo had to tell its fans to shut the hell up about it.

            Palworld is the facelift Pokemon needed.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean…

      I’m glad there are so many Pokemon, and that Pokemon were not unique enough for the most part to be trademarked, but if you think they didn’t lift very heavily from a single source you’re fooling yourself and making flippant accusations of your straw-manned opposition.

      Also I’m questioning if it was actually “way better” or just edgier for the memes that games would latch onto and vehemently defend. It seems to have been very successful in the latter even if it wasn’t their intent.