Discord defends itself against efforts to stop piracy on its platform by saying no to more invasive data collection. Even though Discord isn’t exactly known for privacy, this is a great move for its users. What are your thoughts?

  • ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    If they did not collect any information, they would not have any information to give when they are served a subpoena.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Collecting information, on the context of third parties. Obviously they have information, otherwise the whole system wouldn’t work.

  • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a server with a respectable size.
    Did a hard cutoff due to some stupid discord thing.
    I managed to get a total of 50 people of about 3k to switch and out of those like 7 actually stayed.

    Yet I had to get a burner account again to get in touch with certain people.

    Its all be man.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve never played a Nexus game, and I’m definitely not going to start now. People who are pirating a game aren’t usually doing it bcz they hate the company, or have a vendetta of any kind. It’s usually a money issue. People are more than happy to pay for games when they have money, and you’re not a shit company.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, it’s a convenience/service issue. Last time i’ve seen a third-party launcher was Mirrors Edge on Steam proton, and that thing failed to run since it wanted to open more than my security limit of 50k files, which no game hit before.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not exactly clear on the legal structure for digital platforms, but if you’re physically in the US, you have first amendment protections, regardless of citizenship or residency status. So as long as your group has some US persons in it, you should benefit from their first amendment protections. That said, the first amendment (and fourth, which is about unlawful searches) only applies to governments, so the service you use needs to refuse to hand over data for it to matter at all.

      It’s kind of like people in the US (e.g. me) benefiting from European GDPR protections. Some sites I use now have the option of demanding my deata be deleted, and many sites have cookie preferences, none of which are required in my area.

      That said, I definitely trust technological measures more than legal ones. So I don’t use Discord, because I don’t trust their technological protections. Ideally, Discord wouldn’t have any data to give up, and therefore there wouldn’t be a choice here, they would have no data to give up.

  • swankypantsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I know the feeling. Similar thing happened in a discord I’m in. Rate limit ban on a leader account, no response from support even via burner, then jumped ship to a new one that could actually be managed.

    At least discord has to foot the storage costs of a dead server pestered with bots because of their own incompetence.