• tristan@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Going after a painting that’s behind glass is VERY different to going after the stone henge that has no protective layer, and most importantly of all, has nothing to do with the target of their cause

    saying it destroyed the stone henge is a major exaggeration, saying it did no damage is also just as wrong. The English heritage society emphasised that it was only no VISIBLE damage left, however they also said it did cause damage.

    It’s just like how you can’t touch walls in caves because any change in the oils and stuff in our skins can cause long term damage even though there’s no immediate visible damage

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      How do you think those rocks will fare when the average temperature rises a few degrees?

      Do you think the big stones will avoid damage while humans are fighting wars over water?

      Are those precious rocks going to be ok when countries near the equator become uninhabitable, and the UK has to violently defend its borders from millions of climate refugees?

      Do you think it can still be considered a cultural heritage site after all the humans are dead?