Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Until you actually need a chromium based browser. I get so annoyed when this happens.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      As if installing and using something else means you can’t have Chrome lying around for that one stupid website.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And I do. Sometimes I’ll just fire up Edge if Chrome isn’t installed since it’s chromium based.

    • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      In what situation do you need one?

      I’ve been using Firefox for over a decade and have literally never once needed to open a different web browser. For anything, ever. This is a very common complaint that tons of people seem to have that I have never seen happen even once out in the wild.

      • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Several government websites for the state of Pennsylvania complain and refuse to work if they detect that you aren’t using chrome/edge/safari.

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You can spoof your useragent to appear as chrome. And you should as it makes your browser less “unique”

          • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            While you can do this, it’s not clear to me that you should. There are a number of additional laws having to do with perjury and misusing goverment sites and while I would undoubtedly agree with you, were you to assert the application of those laws to the utilization of a user agent switcher is a ridiculous overreach, I am just as certain I have no desire to be in the hot-seat on the day we all find out.

            • bitwolf@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Oh wow I didn’t know that. I’ll have to double check for the states that are relevant for me.

              I imagine many people naively install a privacy extension and unknowingly have altered useragents

              • datavoid@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Imagine the government coming after someone, demanding they give Google their fair share

                • suburban_hillbilly@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah, because career-minded prosecutors and judges never fuck over little people for minor, technical, harmless violations of the law. 🙄

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Do the sites work if you use an extension that lies to them about what browser you are using?

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Firefox is getting so small it’s starting to disappear out of the testing matrix. Confluence has issues with it, you can’t always log into Vanguard on Firefox, many news website layouts have overlapping elements on Firefox, quite a few shopping websites too (H&M in Europe has a long-standing but with putting stuff in the shopping basket until they revamped their website a couple of months ago). Etc etc. I see it ALL the time.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s still Vivali which is Chromium based and still supporting V2 extension (like uBlock) until June 2025. Its not a full fix, but its a stay of execution. That said, I’m a FF primary user.