Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoDems privately worry how Walz will fare against Vance in VP debatewww.politico.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down124
arrow-up1-19arrow-down1external-linkDems privately worry how Walz will fare against Vance in VP debatewww.politico.comRapidcreek@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoWalz will do fine, the issue is that the bar is incredibly low for Vance. If he can stay on policy, not shit himself over the immigrants eating cats thing, he’ll over-perform.
minus-squareBilliam@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoThe bar for Vance is literally “repeat Republican lies and fear-mongering, but do it coherently.” Since he’s not gonna be fact-checked, that’s all he has to do.
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoHe won’t be fact checked by the moderators, that still leaves him open for Walz.
minus-squareAbidanYre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months ago the bar is incredibly low for Vance. Act vaguely human. Will he be able to pull it off?
Walz will do fine, the issue is that the bar is incredibly low for Vance.
If he can stay on policy, not shit himself over the immigrants eating cats thing, he’ll over-perform.
The bar for Vance is literally “repeat Republican lies and fear-mongering, but do it coherently.”
Since he’s not gonna be fact-checked, that’s all he has to do.
He won’t be fact checked by the moderators, that still leaves him open for Walz.
Act vaguely human.
Will he be able to pull it off?