• Blizzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      There sure are a lot of “Google enshittifies Google” articles lately.

      They are trying to keep up with Microsoft.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        10yrs ago if have said yes… however, I feel like page 1 is only ads and images to ads and sponsored content so I end up on page 2 anyway, so now I have to click a button.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s actually a good change, IMHO. You can just click directly on page 10 for anything that might be related to your original search.

  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m cynically viewing this as not a positive. I assume this is so they can make pages 2, 3 and so on as spammy as page 1.

    Not at first, obviously. You don’t boil that frog on high heat.
    You throw out a second page with a cute little text ad off to the side, then 1 or 2 at the top, then a mid-page ad. Maybe some suggested content.

    Instead of having to scroll through a page’s worth of ads to get to semi-relevant results with a gem hidden in them, it’ll be a pages worth of ads for your semi-relevant results per page, and maybe what you were looking for 4 or 5 pages in.

    Google used to be good. They ‘know’ what people are looking for. So they’ll probably hire someone familiar with gambling to figure out a minimum dispersion of relevant results on the pages, to keep people using the service and scrolling past ads. … I used to remember this. Variable-ratio reward schedule?