Reminder that getting control of the house and senate could make stuff like this potentially get through

This proposal is not only one that expands the number of justices over time but alter things like the court’s shadow docket, require justices to release tax returns, and more

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We can also ask for term limits and other structural things that require a Constitutional Amendment, but we need to do this first.

    Then, after passing the law, go to Republicans and say “There! We undid your fucking up of the courts. You have a choice now: either work with us on a constitutional amendment to help us fundamentally restructure the Court and make is less political, or watch us appoint all these Liberal judges to lifetime appointments and you roll the dice on getting control of the Presidency and both houses of Congress to re-fuck it at some nebulous point in the future”.

    • DekesEnormous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are we going to pretend they’re not just going to jump to the latter without feigning an attempt to do the prior?

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You need a supermajority of states to ratify an amendment, and there is no reason for Republican-led states to back any amendment that will reform the current court. But add six young liberal justices with lifetime tenure, and now they will go out of their way to pass an amendment to term-limit the,.

        • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So this time the Dems will get it together to put 6 judges into an expanded court?

          That would be so much better than the zero which is their average output.