• EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    Is the suggestion here that the only people who support the electoral college are those who don’t want the president to represent the majority of the voting population?

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the argument boils down to the same one that created both a Senate and House of Representatives, which is does the US have allegiance to it’s citizens or it’s States.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Representation by population vs representation by area. The same kind of arguments made in favour of switching the U.S. to a fully proportional system (getting rid of all forms of representation by area) could equally be made in favour of having one world government with proportional representation.

        When we think about it that way (world elections would be dominated by Asia), it’s easy to see why we might not want such a system. Then, returning to the U.S. system alone it’s easier to see why many people want representation by area preserved. Although the cultural differences between states are much smaller than the differences between continents, they’re still very much present and the issues often dominate American politics.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, the suggestion here is that the people supporting the popular vote are doing it because they got burned in 2000 and 2016.

      Had it gone the other way, they wouldn’t be agitating for it.

      If Trump somehow wins the popular vote, but loses the electoral college, WA, OR and CA will be THRILLED.