Really good article I read today. I was already impressed by the first hype of image generators but since haven’t informed myself much. They got really good lately apparently. I can’t decide if I am concerned or impressed. Do you think this would actually be used for something other than memes and misinformation? I thought I might share it and hear your opinions.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, we finally start to get accountability from public officials via bodycam and now here comes technology that will make it trivial to skew the narrative

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I find the author’s reasoning strained. They use flat Earthers as an example of the power of photographs to “prove” reality?

    I question the central premise that photographs were ever the foundation of reality. Haven’t filmmakers been fooling us with photography for over a hundred years?

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      i think its more about the ease.

      you used to need a team, then a qualified professional, now any moron can tell a machine to do it.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      That all comes up in the article. The core idea the author is getting at is the general ease of fabricated situations is coming in a new way that previously hasn’t been a couple clicks for the average user. Think less about political turmoil (propaganda has existed as long as there as been politics) and more about how your Karen aunt can add a worm to their Google review for spaghetti. Most people won’t learn Photoshop, most people can click a few buttons.

      I think it’s still important to consider the tomorrow we’re being thrust into even if we could do this on a smaller scale yesterday.