reuters.com
www.reuters.com
      • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
        11·
        2 months ago

        When you post articles that use data that is damn near a month out of date. Polls from August 25th? Or is it August 27th? Wasn’t that prior to the debate pounding that Harris gave Trump? On top of that where is this data from? What CAIR has posted at first glance does not include geographic breakdowns, so where did that data actually come from?

        • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
          14·
          2 months ago

          I didn’t write the Rueters news article. The date of the article shows “September 19, 20243:21 PM MDT.”

          If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it.

          • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
            11·
            2 months ago

            The date of the article is irrelevant, the article clearly shows the poll was made August 25 to August 27th.

            And I’m not going to bitch to Reuters about the audacity you had to post such nonsense data to a politics community.

              • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
                11·
                2 months ago

                And I just told you that I don’t have a problem with Reuters. I totally get that it is not high priority news and it took them a while to put out a report about it.

                I just told you that it’s you I have a problem with.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    41·
    2 months ago

    Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections.

    She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this.

    • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
      22·
      2 months ago

      You just get that impression because the media isnt interested in her between elections. She continues having events and talks and doing political work.

        • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
          23·
          2 months ago

          You really cant be crusading against a party being elected and then try and complain that theyre not getting elected.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
            2·
            2 months ago

            Jill Stein doesn’t put in the efforts between presidential elections to promote her party or to get her candidates elected in local, state or federal elections. She’s not for helping anyone besides herself and a majority of Muslim Americans realize this

            This was my original comment, the one you responded to.

            • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
              12·
              2 months ago

              Yes, effort is put in. Effort that you and the DNC are fighting against on a daily basis. How much effort gets someone elected for the green party? Can you give me a number of speeches given, emails sent, flyers put up, that guarantees their candidate gets elected?

                • blazera@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  12·
                  2 months ago

                  Nah we’re talking about putting in effort. They can put in all the work in the world but they cant force anyone to vote for them.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    26·
    2 months ago

    They should withhold their vote for the person contributing to getting their family members killed. When Democrats lose again it will be their own doing, again.

    The cult of personality to the point of being willing to overlook genocide is insane

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        26·
        2 months ago

        They dont understand how election math works, a vote for Harris is taking a vote away from a third party candidate and is giving it to Trump.

        • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
          2·
          2 months ago

          That’s not how any of that works. The only reason people consider 3rd party votes throw aways is because 3rd party absolutely with 100% confidence will not win the federal election right now. America isn’t primed to allow that to happen at this stage and level. They need to take local elections first and build up the movement getting enough backing to make the federal level even close to possible.

          And whether voting for 3rd party is throwing a vote to one of the other two parties comes down to which one the voter would have voted for had a 3rd party not been an option. If they would’ve voted for the democratic candidate, but instead chose to vote for a 3rd party that has 0% chance of winning, then yeah, it hurts the democratic platforms chances. If they would have voted republican, but chose to vote for a 3rd party with 0% chance of winning the it hurts the repiblican platforms chance. Therefore green party votes are considered mostly detrimental to democratic platforms because their voters are more left leaning in nature. Few would vote republican when no 3rd party option presented itself.

          The idea that voting democratic or republican is throwing away a vote from green to their competitor isn’t functional since the party has zero chance of winning, even if the fence sitters joined them. If they were competitive on federal level you would have a point though.

          • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
            15·
            2 months ago

            Why is that not how it works, it seems to be the preferred method when the candidates are rearranged? The whole Stein vote gives it to Trump bullshit.