• fiercekitten@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    The headline for this story was corrected to reflect that the surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, had declared gun violence a public health crisis, rather than a public health emergency. The surgeon general does not have the power to declare a public health emergency.

    OP might want to update the title of this post.

  • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Once again we’re being subject to the deep state’s WOKE agenda! First they tell us that RESPIRATORY ILLNESS and UNPASTURIZED DAIRY PRODUCTS are dangerous to control us and give us gay autism, and now they’re trying to brainwash us by scaring us away from our GOD GIVEN SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS!! Little snowflakes scared of a little lead?? Like this little semi-automatic riffle that I had somebody in Tennessee buy for me even though I have no use for it?? Scared of the wittle bullets I’m putting in? Scared of having a cute wittle gun pointed at you? Scared of resting it under your chin, like so? Scared of putting a wittle bit of pressure on the tr

    (disclamer: this was supposed to be a “proverbially shooting yourself turned litteral” joke please don’t ban me)

  • hypnoton@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Knives and pipe bombs will replace the guns if need be.

    Wealth inequality is the real problem that’s causing a spike in violence, not guns per se.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I highly doubt that a knife or pipe bomb could have killed 60 and wounded more than 400 from a Vegas hotel room. Guns are the most effective tool people use to kill other people and it’s designed for just that.

      That being said, yes, economic inequality is absolutely an important cause of much crime and desperation in the US. But half of the population also won’t do anything about that, because less inequality is “socialism” or whatever. And round and round we go.