• EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I was just wondering about a general privacy goal of having an LLM bot just flood the zone with random data to try and confound advertising models, simulating clicks and likes/engagement across the spectrum just to wreck any meaningful data correlations.

    If you were aiming this concept at two specific targets, i.e., costing the Trump campaign money and screwing with their data, things could get really interesting. Like an open source bot that would coordinate bizarre trends across large cohorts of users to convince the data miners that, for example, a disproportionate number of voters in key regions are demographically or behaviorally skewed.

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    As much as the hacker in me would love to do this, I sincerely hope ideas (posts… not ideas really) like this don’t become fodder for the paranoia propaganda machine driving MAGA.

    • recapitated@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have no problem taking flack for it. In my view they’re so far off base that a flurry of unforced errors unravel with every variable.

  • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Anything that you can think of has already been thought of, modelled, and done by international actors who have more resources, technical capability and time than you, and have far fewer morals.

    You want a specific outcome to this election? So do Russia and China. They’re a lot better at this than you are and are orders of magnitude more invested in it.

    • recapitated@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m spitballing for a conversation. I don’t think I’m a pivotal strategic player.

      Edit: that said, I do think what you said is certainly worth mention, so I want to get ahead of my defensiveness.

      So to continue, do you think that such a tactic would be valuable for a state funded interest?

  • SynAcker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I read once that a good thing to do was to physically mail a low denomination check to the campaign. All because the work and effort to record and deposit the funds was so labor intensive by an actual person.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’ll need to mail thousands of them for it to matter. The labor and expense for you to do that is greater than the labor and expense for them. Plus, I feel like they’d probably just throw the checks away if they are like a penny, or something stupid low.