• ccunning@lemmy.world
    211·
    2 months ago

    This is a debate between the parties of war and Wall Street who agree with each other on the fundamentals of our economy and on the fundamentals of our foreign policy

    Jill’s solution to “endless war” is to disband NATO, stop supporting Ukraine, and hand Kyiv to Putin. With NATO disbanded, further European countries will be sure to follow.

    • Sanctus@lemmy.worldEnglish
      46·
      2 months ago

      A lot of that platform actually sounds good. But you are right.

      Disband NATO and replace it with a modern, inclusive security framework that respects the security interests of all nations and people

      Thats pretty vague, so no idea what this entails in reality.

  • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
    123·
    2 months ago

    198 Posts

    1.24K Comments

    Joined 1 month

    Source: https://lemmy.ml/u/UniversalMonk@lemmy.world

    If it took only 10 seconds to post each time, and 20 seconds to make a comment, that means you have spent:

    (198 * 10) + (1240 * 20) = 26780 seconds

    Or, 7.44 hours, in one month. That’s almost 5% the amount of time people spend working full time. Almost a full work day. And these are extremely generous estimates that assume you are very fast. I have no doubt you have spent minutes responding to some of the comments calling you out.

    A more realistic set of numbers would be

    (198 * 30) + (1240 * 45) = 61740 seconds

    Or, 17.15 hours, in one month. That’s almost 43% the amount of time people spend working full time. Over 2 full work days.

    To calculate the number of times you submitted content per waking hour:

    (198 + 1240) / (16 * 30) = 3

    Or once every 20 minutes on average, assuming you sleep. Almost every single one promoting third party candidates. Totally and completely not sus, at all. Not even a little bit.

      • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
        103·
        2 months ago

        Of course. You would only explain why you post three times per hour

        • in favor of third party candidates
        • suddenly, starting 3 months before the election
        • increasing in frequency after the debate
        • despite the massive amount of critical comments you get

        If the explanation would not get you permabanned.

            • ClassStruggle@lemmy.mlEnglish
              28·
              2 months ago

              No one owes you an explanation for anything, You’re demanding an explanation for someone else’s actions the same way that Democrats demand votes from everyone. They’re not entitled and you were not entitled.

            • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
              310·
              2 months ago

              Nope. I don’t have to explain anything to you. Stay as mad as you want. Under this username or your various other ones. But I owe you nothing. :)

              • LifeGivesYouLemmys@lemmy.ml
                51·
                2 months ago

                You apparently are pretty confused. “you have to” and “you would” are extremely different phrases, and I never once implied they were similar. Only that you wouldn’t need to pretend “the articles are interesting” is your motivation, in a context which implicates you as sketch af, if you weren’t sketch af.

                You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are. I guess it’s possible you’re a masochist who likes being insulted, but I think the other explanation is much more likely ;)

                • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
                  17·
                  2 months ago

                  You’d simply explain it and avoid thousands of replies telling you how horrible you are.

                  I don’t care if “thousands” of people are telling me how “horrible” I am. I can post what I want as long as it fits the community guidelines. And I will continue to do so.

                  And I don’t have to explain anything to you. Thank you!

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    1·
    2 months ago
    MSN.com - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for MSN.com:

    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/jill-stein-delivers-scathing-response-to-harris-trump-debate-and-urges-green-alternative/ar-AA1qoTPO?ocid=BingNewsVerp

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

  • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
    218·
    2 months ago

    To cut through the nonsense and save everyone time, especially since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to posts recently: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.

    I’m just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.