BlowMe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 5 months agoIs there any real physical proof that Jesus christ ever existed?message-squaremessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareIs there any real physical proof that Jesus christ ever existed?BlowMe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squarefrightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months ago They very likely was someone named Jesus, because there were many people with that name. The second one doesn’t use that name. Read the sources. There’s 0 evidence or recorded documentation that a resurrection ever happened. That’s the big one. Well of course, but that’s common sense. Dead people stay dead as a rule.
minus-squarefrog_brawler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoI didn’t say the second one used “that name.” Read what I wrote.
minus-squarefrightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months ago There’s 0 evidence or recorded documentation that a resurrection ever happened. That’s the big one. The question in question was “Is there any real physical proof that Jesus christ ever existed?”
minus-squarefrog_brawler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoJesus Christ is very specific. Jesus Christ, the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day… that is fake.
minus-squarefrightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoWell that’s an entirely different question. Entirely different field. “the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day” is for silly Christians. The question under discussion here is about Roman-era history.
minus-squarefrog_brawler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 months agoYou suck ass at reading. The title of this post is asking about “Jesus Christ,” which we all know to mean the son of God and the guy that resurrected after 3 days.
The second one doesn’t use that name. Read the sources.
Well of course, but that’s common sense. Dead people stay dead as a rule.
I didn’t say the second one used “that name.” Read what I wrote.
The question in question was “Is there any real physical proof that Jesus christ ever existed?”
Jesus Christ is very specific. Jesus Christ, the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day… that is fake.
Well that’s an entirely different question. Entirely different field.
“the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day” is for silly Christians.
The question under discussion here is about Roman-era history.
You suck ass at reading. The title of this post is asking about “Jesus Christ,” which we all know to mean the son of God and the guy that resurrected after 3 days.