renzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 个月前AI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up118arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
arrow-up118arrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 个月前message-square25fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.world
minus-squareSerinus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
minus-squareMatriks404@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 个月前Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?
I mean, it’s not wrong…
Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?