In reference to: https://lemmy.world/post/23862757

I use Void btw

Image text:

Most people rejected his message.

“Systemd is Satan’s creation! Pure Evil!”

They hated Talking Pig because He told them the truth.

  • skulbuny@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Upvoted because it belongs in this community, and should not be silenced, even though it is the wrong opinion

  • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    I don’t really get the hate for systemd. At least for someone who started really using Linux after it was introduced, it always seemed easier to control and manage than the init.d stuff.

    Obviously it’s a hassle to migrate if you have a ton of legacy services, but it’s pretty nice.

    • pelya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s because you now need to do systemctl restart sshd instead of /etc/init.d/sshd restart, I see no other reason than having to learn new syntax.

      Arguably, init.d scripts were easier to understand, and systemd is a bit of a black box, it somehow works, but who knows where it writes logs or saves the process pid (it’s all in the documentation somewhere), with init.d script you can just open the script itself and look.

      • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        I think it’s okay to not 100% know every little detail of how a system works, as long as it’s possible to find out what you need when you need it.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Don’t minimize those strengths. Init.d scripts are something you can figure out just knowing a bit of shell script, or historical knowledge from before there was an internet. For something I rarely use, why do I need to learn something more complex to do the same thing - I either haven’t been sold on all the new functionality they piled in or do not need it. After all these years crowing about the Unix/linux way being many independent flexible tools that can work together, why do we now have this all-in-one monstrosity that might as well have come directly from Microsoft?

    • kshade@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      I’m about 2 decades in too, really not here to argue since everything has already been said multiple times. I do see systemd in a somewhat similar light as Pulseaudio. Yes, some good ideas there and it’s a useful tool, but it wasn’t the be-all end-all solution.

  • Amon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 days ago

    Install what you want we’re in the land of the free (and open source software) here

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Poettering worked for Red Hat from 2008 to 2022.[2][3] He then joined Microsoft.

    In 2017, Poettering received the Pwnie Award for Lamest Vendor Response to vulnerabilities reported in systemd.

    This Mastodon stream from Lennart Poettering describes a sudo replacement — called run0 — that will be part of the upcoming systemd 256 release. It takes a rather different approach to the execution of privileged commands, avoiding the use of setuid (which he calls “SUID”) permissions entirely.

    Basically Microsoft bloat confirmed, everyone switch back to OpenRC lol

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I’ve never really had issues with systemd, but I must say when I was setting up void I did really enjoy the runit init system 🤷‍♂️

  • TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah, I’m planning to switch from Arch to Gentoo. Systemd isn’t the only reason, but it’s a big one.

    (Yes, I know about Artix, but it’s… kindof a Frankenstein’s monster, still mostly depending on the Arch repos and still with certain relics of Systemd. Or at least it was when I last tried it.)

    • kshade@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      If you like Arch you might like Void, it has roughly similar ideals and a very fast package manager. No AUR equivalent though.

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It can build packages from source like Gentoo though if I remember right

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I still can’t wrap my head around why SystemD has become the defacto standard & why aren’t devs trying out OTHER init-systems

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago
      1. It was doing new things.
      2. It was easier to learn.
      3. The other init systems were (are) stagnant.

      Imagine trying to get new, young developers to adopt C or Pascal when the likes of Rust and Python exist. You can make arguments for a thing’s superiority based on moral standards (which are always subjective), but morality is a poor metric. If everything was done based on that, the Linux ecosystem would be in the same state as the GNU Hurd kernel.

    • lurklurk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      It’s pretty good at starting services. It just keeps adding bundled things people wouldn’t use otherwise, in a fairly microsoft fashion