Jo Miran@lemmy.ml to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agoEqual under the law or somethinglemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1471arrow-down145file-text
arrow-up1426arrow-down1external-linkEqual under the law or somethinglemmy.mlJo Miran@lemmy.ml to A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world · edit-23 months agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·3 months agoThe screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
minus-squaregeneva_convenience@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoDid the guy happen to be brown or something?
minus-squarefrostysauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·3 months agoAnd it no longer is, so you should delete it.
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 months agoDid the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.
minus-squareLovableSidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down9·3 months agoTaking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
minus-squaretrolololol@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·3 months agoIt’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure. OP should keep the post up. Tankie alert
minus-squareLovableSidekick@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down7·3 months agoWillful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoIt isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
The screenshot includes a date and time. It was accurate at the time.
Did the guy happen to be brown or something?
And it no longer is, so you should delete it.
Did the FBI say initially say it was not terrorism? Yes. Regardless of whether or not they changed their mind later, their initial reaction is and will always be fact. That was the point of the post.
Taking shit down when you find out it’s wrong is a thing.
It’s a note for historians. And how they backtracked based on public pressure.
OP should keep the post up.
Tankie alert
Willful ignorance can in fact be a tool for historians, so at least that part of the rationalization is true,
It isn’t wrong. They said it wasn’t terrorism at first. That is and will remain a fact and it is the point of the post.
deleted by creator