It isn’t bad these days. You just go into the software center and make a few clicks. It is something that you can find guides on how to do.

I wouldn’t call switching kernels that hard. It takes a few clicks and a reboot to do. However, they kicker is that you need to know to do that. You don’t know what you don’t know.

No, for one Red hat has every incentive to support Fedora. Also Fedora does its own thing separate from Red hat. Red hat does have some control but the community elects leadership and the elected leaders are what control the project direction. Also Fedora has a lot of volunteer package maintainers that would stop working if there was a hostile take over.

Notice that the community has left Ubuntu which used to be the community go to. They no longer have a large community working on projects and maintaining software.

I wish it shipped a newer kernel

Because it is stable and works really well. It has GUI apps that are not only not broken but well designed and snappy.

Honestly China makes me really sad. It has such a long and rich history and now the government seems to be completely separated from the government.

It is in fact not that secure by default. It lacks a way to manage the desktop in mass. Not to mention is also lacks a firewall and selinux but those can be enabled. Also I wouldn’t trust the lock screen as it can be bypassed because it is Xorg.

Linux Mint is very good for general usage but I doubt its security in a military application. It is better than before which is good.

Be safe out there. People can disappear in China over just about anything

He needs to be installing security patches. You can setup automatic upgrades in software updater.

The actual implementation would be per desktop. The desktop draws to the screen and then the apps connect to the desktop. We already have a window capture XDG portal that is used by things like OBS. We could huild a simular portal for just text on the screen. We would just need some way of either recognizing text or even better some sort of image to text engine like what is in Firefox.

While I don’t have a good understanding of that I do think this might have some sanitary implications

Linux isn’t great in terms or high security. It isn’t bad but it does have a lot of CVEs. I imagine there is some highly compact and locked down OS used.

It probably depends how many billions are going into it.

That is actually terrifying. How do they secure and lock it down?

I don’t find that problematic as they are the ones how are likely to push for good security and reliability

Rockets probably use a dedicated OS that is safety validated. Getting something validated for critical operations is a massive endeavor.

It depends on what side you are on. At the end of the day a tool is a tool

Why are you asking? Yes it is used but obviously the exact systems are kept secret. As far as I know it is a mixed environment. I do know the US Air Force uses Kubernetes

Crazy not having the powerhouse of the cell

In the future you could have him make an image of the old device and move it over. That would allow him to keep all data and configurations.