• Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Encouraging. However, there seems to be a question missing in the discussion: why aren’t more people taking the reduced hour offerings?

    According to the report itself, after the first stage of trial, 86% of the working population started to negotiate for reduced hours, of the people surveyed, 51% were offered reduced hours and only 14% took them. It’s an unprecedented large proportion, but still less than one would expect given the benefits. There are other factors preventing people to do so. I hope there will be a follow-up research to find out why.

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      27 days ago

      I think it’s probably like the other commenter said, just money. I think it may be “the other thing”? Where you can have whatever rules and policies in place at the govt level, but if there’s a “work hard / sacrifice for dumb reasons” culture solidly entrenched at work…well, writing’s on the wall. Do that or be soft-ostracized.

      I do think the rules make an impact anywhere there’s a functioning government, just by slowly shifting what people see (accept?) as “normal”.

  • sir_pronoun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    27 days ago

    So they can choose to take the 36 hour week, right? Guess that means they earn less if they do?