So we’ve seen the complaints and the reports and boy oh boy are there complaints and reports.

I’ve discussed the account with the other mods and admins multiple times, and while we agree the volume is a lot, it doesn’t point to a botfarm or multiple people using the account.

Obsessive? Absolutely, but not technically rule breaking… Until today.

Today they indescriminately posted the same story three times from three different sources apparently solely to flood the channel showing a decided lack of judgement.

It’s a valid story from a valid source, the original has been kept here:

https://lemmy.world/post/21098916

The others have been removed as duplicates.

I’m also applying a 15 day temp ban on the account.

“15 days? That’s oddly specific! What’s in 15… OH!”

  • SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 month ago

    HOW do you post here 1.9k times in two months? I have like 7 posts in over a year and I feel somewhat active.

    I’m not complaining about any decisions mods have made, I’m legitimately asking cause that seems crazy. 32 posts a day is a LOT.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I told them in PMs that, as a mod, I self limit to 3 posts a day for fear of being seen as putting my thumb on the scale and influencing the discourse.

      And that’s in the groups I mod(!)

      He’s over that by a factor of 10+

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      32 posts a day is a LOT.

      Honestly, that’s not even that impressive… It’s only 4 posts per hour over a 8 hour work day, which is completely achievable if Internet trolling is your hobby of choice.

      What’s really impressive is the number of comments. I won’t speculate on Monk’s motives (out of fear of running afoul of this community’s rules) except to say that they seem extremely motivated to argue with anyone and everyone who posts a disagreeing comment. Their tactic is to bicker with any dissenting voices (without actually engaging with their arguments) to the point of exhaustion so that no one will bother engaging anymore — a very specific strategy I have to imagine is designed to shift the Overton window a particular way.

      Fortunately, their efforts seem to have been mostly ineffective given the number of people around here who continue to call out their BS. So keep fighting the good fight, I guess!

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “I’ll keep posting what I want, when I want, where I want, and respond to people how I want. Whether it is “working” or not. Thank you!” - Monk

    This is when I realized it was all in bad faith and I stopped giving him the benefit of the doubt.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh holy fuck it’s only 15 days away! Anxiety!

    Also having seen the guy, makes sense you can’t ban bad takes (or at least, shouldn’t) but my sense is he just likes to be infamous. Hell, this is a post about his banning, even! He’s probably loving the attention.

    Still, I’ve got my Lemmy heroes — obsessive posting can be used for good, like a certain maneuver named after a certain starship captain.

  • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve handled users like this similarly in some of the communities I head up here. I try not to touch the content unless it is obvious misinformation and that violates instances rules. That said, if their content and or comments are clearly intended to create discord, pester, or pester in a passive aggressive manor, then they get the boot.

    I wish we had some sort of sort filter that hid aggressively downvoted content and comments. That way the “knights of the new” could bury problematic content.

    People don’t like the idea of mods having to censor users, but they also don’t want their feed full of downvoted posts or infighting.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Maybe some kind of rate limiting would work for cases like this. Anyway, i doubt we’ll see that one again after the 15 days are up. At least for the next four years.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      If they don’t reappear then I think there is a legitimate argument that it was a coordinated propaganda account.

      If they do come back with the same level of veracity then I think there is merit to the potential mental illness, or neurodivergence argument.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ll bet they have an alt account up and running already in either case.

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I mean maybe, but I think it would be pretty obvious given the nature of how and what they post.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, reddit had something like that baked in, I’m not sure how lemmy could implement it.

      “You are doing that too much, try again later.”

      It seemed to be tied to both the age of the account and the karma of the account. It varies from subreddit to subreddit.

      There also seemed to be a difference if you were subscribed to the community or not.

      But then we’re comparing something relatively new (lemmy) to an established platform with over a decade of development too.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I asked in our Discord. I think the limiting factor is federation. I’m not sure how it’s possible to rate limit things in a federated environment.

          Fortunatley we have smarter people than me around!

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Sounds like a bot could do the job. Counts submissions in a rolling 24 hour period and fires a report off if someone goes over. Or it even deletes the post itself.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          For local, lemmy.world users, yeah. I think the confounding factor is federation, but like I say, I raised the issue and we have people way smarter than me!

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            I was just thinking about reading the name and time on the post and running a counter. Then deleting the posts if they are above the limit.

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    You gotta know they’re absolutely loving this shit right now. An entire post dedicated only to them? Where they are the topic of discussion? That’s probably the biggest badge of honor someone like them could earn here.

    I’d wager it’s bookmarked and will be read several times a day for months to come.

  • DaddysLittleSlut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I posted this to him actually

    My background is psychology, developmental, business, design and more. Currently learning communication. He removed my comments for “off topic” when about he mentioned worker rights. Thus is one the most important

    Video to him