• ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re not even Republicans from 10-20 years ago. They’re Republicans from five years ago.

    • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes because Republicans from five years ago would definitely have all the largest union leaders and several socialists speaking at their convention.

      • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If they were speaking at the DNC, they were not socialists. They had more Republicans and cops speaking at that convention than marginalized communities.

        • Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If they were speaking at the DNC, they were not socialists.

          So Bernie and AOC aren’t socialists now?

          They had more Republicans and cops speaking at that convention than marginalized communities.

          Uh? No they didn’t? Did you even watch the convention? They had a few Republicans and cops who spoke for less than ten minutes each. Meanwhile they had dozens of women of color, and women’s rights were one of the main themes of the entire convention.

          • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Why would they watch the conversation when you can just make up what you feel probably happened based on emotion?

            Lemmy has a real feelings = facts problem and it’s sad.