• Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If living areas of the Olympics are getting hot enough that AC gives an advantage. They’re too damn hot, and that’s on France…

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        ACs are not being provided to reduce emissions. Everyone is being asked to accept an equal handicap, so that the world does not become even hotter in the coming years. It’s largely symbolic, I agree, but I suppose kicking out a team that prioritises its medal tally over the climate crisis would send an even stronger signal.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, it’s just posturing. The emissions from AC at the Olympic Village would have zero impact on climate change. This is just green washing for public perception points.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            The emissions saved from removing a few hundred ACs are negligible. But the message it sends to the millions watching the Olympics is significant. Which, again, is why I am hoping there will be at least some symbolic action against rule-breakers - it will start a conversation about the need to regulate / ban ACs.