• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They don’t love America. They love hierarchy.

      This representative probably thinks he deserves the combat badge because of his imagined status.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    “A recipient must be personally present and under hostile fire while serving in an assigned infantry or SF primary duty in a unit actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy,” Army regulations stipulate.

    “Personnel with other than an infantry or SF MOS [Special Forces Military Occupational Specialty] are not eligible, regardless of the circumstances.”

    During the time of his service, the Lone Star rep was working as a civil affairs officer rather than an infantryman or Special Forces soldier, according to CBS.

    So he was working in an office, not in combat, but thinks he ‘deserves’ to wear the combat badge anyway.

    Classic example of selfish stupidity right there.

      • dhork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It sounds like he was awarded the badge through the normal process, and it was only after the fact where it was determined he didn’t meet the requirements, and they “rescinded” it. So, at least in his case, there is a bit more to it than simply lying about his service

        But that only leads to more questions, because shouldn’t they be looking more closely at this shit when they give those awards out? Who did he (or his superiors) have to convince to not look at the list too closely?

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d also like to mention how boot (cringe) it is to put your medals on your civilian clothes. People with actual personalities don’t do that.