• Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Better title: “Photographers complain when their use of AI is identified as such”

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I saw a video posted by someone who claimed to have taught their cat how to skateboard. and at the bottom it was tagged made with AI.

    meta w

    • parody@lemmings.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Did they just e.g. remove a passing car from the background*, and will tags on some images lead to untagged fake images being trusted more? Oh this fun new world we’re in.

      *as someone else pointed out, if it was a minor edit, was the underlying technology using legit training data or unlicensed stuff

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Right? I thought I went crazy when I got to “I just used Generative Fill!” Like, he didn’t just auto adjust the exposure and black levels! C’mon!

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think every touch up besides color correction and cropping should be labeled as “photoshopped”. And any usage of AI should be labeled as “Made with AI” because it cannot show which parts are real and which are not.

    Besides, this is totally a skill issue. Removing this metadata is trivial.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Some of the more advanced color correction tools can drastically change an image. There’s a lot of gray in that line as well.