• ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I connect my glucometer (Dexcom G6) with my phone and I’m assuming lineage wouldn’t work with it.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lineage is just Android, however, some apps (Usually banking apps are the worst offender) throw a fit running on rooted/custom roms, though it’s usually bypass able with varying amounts of effort. I would not expect a glucometer app to have issues, but I’ve seen apps throw that fit for less in the past.

      Being a medical thing, I’d advise you to pickup a cheap used Android phone that’s also on the supported list to test out your app first, or at least have an alternative means of monitoring it

      I did some Google searching and it came up… inconclusive, though the Dexcom website has this blurb on the compatible phones section

      “You can use this app on any OS that meets the minimum requirements, but Dexcom recommends not updating to a new OS before it’s listed here.”

      And the only minimum requirement for Android is that it’s v10. I also didn’t see mention of root/or “unauthorized OSes” on that page and alot of the times they will put something like that if a companies app will scan for root/custom roms

      So, you might be fine

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Last time I checked there was a relatively narrow selection of phones the Dexcom app works with. Pretty much just iphone, galaxy, and pixel. I just checked again and there’s a lot more now, so maybe it’ll work?

      • Noedel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Does NFC still work? (I know that low key defeats the purpose of a privacy oriented android build but yeah)

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          afaik it should. but why do you think NFC defeats privacy? it is quite short range, isn’t it? having google services is much worse

          • Noedel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Well, I was mostly concerned about google knowing where I’m shopping. I know using google pay is lazy buy I’m not perfect…

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              oh google pay, I see. but that’s not NFC’s fault, it’s useful for other things too.

              speaking about it, I’m not sure google pay will work. but I never used it, so I don’t know for sure, but there’s this suspicion after what banks do

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      that’s not a feature of the ROM. that’s a tool provided by ROM maintainers. that being said, it almost certainly supports it, as in in someone makes a website that does that, it will be possible.

      now, don’t get me started on how bad of an idea it is to use webusb

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        don’t get me started on how bad of an idea it is to use webusb

        I will get you started. Please explain.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          there is no way to verify the downloaded package before installation.

          also I generally deem both webusb, and chrome’s broader filesystem access apis dangerous, partly because a vulnerability in the website permission checking code with this permission is much worse than with e.g. the camera.
          but the more realirealistic problem is that its just too easy to grant a random website so deep permissions to your device, either by accident, by habit or because the user does not understand what is happening. just a click or two and you have just granted a ransom website full access to your drive. with webusb, they can even write a bootable anything to your pendrive.

          my concern here is not that you cannot make sure that the graphene website will only do what it needs to, but that the feature exists at all, because of all the other websites. I sincerely bless mozilla for not implementing these.